Letters to the Editor

 

September 22, 2022



To the editor,

There has been a recent uproar about which books should be available to children in our public library. The people who have voiced their concerns have stated repeatedly that their concerns are not political, homophobic, transphobic, or anti-sex. Many have stated, on social media and in letters to the editor, that their concern is merely for the safety of the children, and the protection of their innocence. Some have said they are not asking for books to be banned, just removed from the children's section. It's true that the books in question could be moved to higher shelves, or another area in the library. It would be easy enough–and absolutely appropriate–to contact the library director and request that the books be moved. Perhaps some have done this.

Unfortunately, what many have done instead is call for our library director's resignation and labeled anyone who defends these books (including the library director, board, and staff) pedophiles and sexual groomers. The most graphic pages of the books in question are being photographed and shared to social media by the people who are most offended by the content. Do they not realize that by doing this, they are making those pages even more accessible to kids? Parents, make sure you are logged off of Facebook while the kids are at home or they might unwittingly learn something you explicitly said you don't want them to learn!

One of the most disturbing aspects of this campaign against the library director, staff, and board, is that much of the malicious slander directed at them is being circulated on a Facebook page called Dayton WA Uncensored, of which our elected Port Commissioner, Seth Bryan, is an admin. Mr. Bryan himself has participated in maligning the library staff. This pattern of demonizing individuals with whom they disagree, is becoming commonplace with a certain group of citizens–Mr. Bryan's Facebook page has been center stage for much of it, as he perpetuates personal attacks on the citizens he has been elected to serve.

Regardless of how you feel about the placement of books in our library, there is absolutely no excuse for this defamation of character. I am extremely disheartened by this behavior, especially from an elected official in our community.

Shellie McLeod

Dayton, Wash.

To the editor,

I read the following statement at the meeting of the Columbia County Board of Trustees on Monday, September 19.

I have a master's degree in library science from the University of Washington, and I was the branch manager of the Dayton Memorial library. In that capacity, I was in charge of collection development for the children's materials, and then for the whole library. I'd like to commend Todd on prioritizing an inclusive collection that reflects the diverse experiences of the youth in our community. And for having good policies in place that avoid further erosion of our freedom of self-expression.

The librarian's job is to provide resources to the whole community without judgment. It is my job as a parent to decide which resources are appropriate for my child. Some of the topics I think are appropriate are going to be different from other parents' and vice versa. That means that not everything in the library is going to be for me, and that's ok. It's important that diverse books be included in the collection and promoted without shame or stigma attached. Restricting access to these materials doesn't protect children from complex issues, it only means they will turn to less reliable and more dangerous sources of information.

I understand the concerns over some of the material that's been posted online. I wouldn't want my 6-year-old to read some of those passages either. I wouldn't check that book out for her and there's little chance that she'd accidentally pick it up because the good news is that my 6-year-old isn't allowed in the library without supervision. And for good reason. The public library isn't any safer than any other public place.

I do think that the teen section could use some physical delineation from the children's section. Maybe an appropriate solution would be to move the teen library or put some architectural separation between it and the children's library. I don't think that's an unreasonable request.

What I do think is unreasonable is for a small group of vocal activists to dictate the books all our children have access to. I disagree that ideas in these books are causing harm. I don't support their removal or the effective banning of these books by restricting access. I reject the idea that a book on a shelf is "grooming" children. I reject the idea that a book about institutional racism in America is somehow going to indoctrinate Dayton's white children with some kind of liberal agenda. Books are about expanding your base of knowledge. If a book makes you see an issue from someone else's point of view, that's a good thing in my opinion.

I think that Todd and this board understand what is at stake for the youth of our community, how they feel about themselves and each other, and whether or not they have the resources they need to navigate a treacherous world safely. I trust that they will listen to everyone and do what is best for the WHOLE community.

Amy Rosenberg

Dayton, Wash.

 
 

Our Family of Publications Includes:

Dayton Chronicle
East Washingtonian

Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation
© Copyright 2024

Rendered 02/26/2024 11:03